Chapter 31. Gotchas

Here are some (non-recommended!) scripting practices that will bring excitement into an otherwise dull life.

• Assigning reserved words or characters to variable names.

  case=value0 # Causes problems. 23skidoo=value1 # Also problems. # Variable names starting with a digit are reserved by the shell. # Try _23skidoo=value1. Starting variables with an underscore is okay. # However . . . using just an underscore will not work. _=25 echo $_ # $_ is a special variable set to last arg of last command. # But . . . _ is a valid function name! xyz((!*=value2 # Causes severe problems. # As of version 3 of Bash, periods are not allowed within variable names.

• Using a hyphen or other reserved characters in a variable name (or function name).

  var-1=23 # Use 'var_1' instead. function-whatever () # Error # Use 'function_whatever ()' instead. # As of version 3 of Bash, periods are not allowed within function names. function.whatever () # Error # Use 'functionWhatever ()' instead.

• Using the same name for a variable and a function. This can make a script difficult to understand.

  do_something () { echo "This function does something with \"$1\"." } do_something=do_something do_something do_something # All this is legal, but highly confusing.

• Using whitespace inappropriately. In contrast to other programming languages, Bash can be quite finicky about whitespace.

  var1 = 23 # 'var1=23' is correct. # On line above, Bash attempts to execute command "var1" # with the arguments "=" and "23". let c = $a - $b # Instead: let c=$a-$b or let "c = $a - $b" if [ $a -le 5] # if [ $a -le 5 ] is correct. # ^^ if [ "$a" -le 5 ] is even better. # [[ $a -le 5 ]] also works.

• Not terminating with a semicolon the final command in a code block within curly brackets.

  { ls -l; df; echo "Done." } # bash: syntax error: unexpected end of file { ls -l; df; echo "Done."; } # ^ ### Final command needs semicolon.

• Assuming uninitialized variables (variables before a value is assigned to them) are "zeroed out". An uninitialized variable has a value of null, not zero.

  #!/bin/bash echo "uninitialized_var = $uninitialized_var" # uninitialized_var =

• Mixing up = and -eq in a test. Remember, = is for comparing literal variables and -eq for integers.

  if [ "$a" = 273 ] # Is $a an integer or string? if [ "$a" -eq 273 ] # If $a is an integer. # Sometimes you can interchange -eq and = without adverse consequences. # However . . . a=273.0 # Not an integer. if [ "$a" = 273 ] then echo "Comparison works." else echo "Comparison does not work." fi # Comparison does not work. # Same with a=" 273" and a="0273". # Likewise, problems trying to use "-eq" with non-integer values. if [ "$a" -eq 273.0 ] then echo "a = $a" fi # Aborts with an error message. # test.sh: [: 273.0: integer expression expected

• Misusing string comparison operators.

  Example 31-1. Numerical and string comparison are not equivalent

  #!/bin/bash # bad-op.sh: Trying to use a string comparison on integers. echo number=1 # The following while-loop has two errors: #+ one blatant, and the other subtle. while [ "$number" < 5 ] # Wrong! Should be: while [ "$number" -lt 5 ] do echo -n "$number " let "number += 1" done # Attempt to run this bombs with the error message: #+ bad-op.sh: line 10: 5: No such file or directory # Within single brackets, "<" must be escaped, #+ and even then, it's still wrong for comparing integers. echo "---------------------" while [ "$number" \< 5 ] # 1 2 3 4 do # echo -n "$number " # It *seems* to work, but . . . let "number += 1" #+ it actually does an ASCII comparison, done #+ rather than a numerical one. echo; echo "---------------------" # This can cause problems. For example: lesser=5 greater=105 if [ "$greater" \< "$lesser" ] then echo "$greater is less than $lesser" fi # 105 is less than 5 # In fact, "105" actually is less than "5" #+ in a string comparison (ASCII sort order). echo exit 0

• Attempting to use let to set string variables.

  let "a = hello, you" echo "$a" # 0

• Sometimes variables within "test" brackets ([ ]) need to be quoted (double quotes). Failure to do so may cause unexpected behavior. See Example 7-6, Example 19-5, and Example 9-6.

• Quoting a variable containing whitespace prevents splitting. Sometimes this produces unintended consequences.

• Commands issued from a script may fail to execute because the script owner lacks execute permission for them. If a user cannot invoke a command from the command-line, then putting it into a script will likewise fail. Try changing the attributes of the command in question, perhaps even setting the suid bit (as root, of course).

• Attempting to use - as a redirection operator (which it is not) will usually result in an unpleasant surprise.

  command1 2> - | command2 # Trying to redirect error output of command1 into a pipe . . . # . . . will not work. command1 2>& - | command2 # Also futile. Thanks, S.C.

• Using Bash version 2+ functionality may cause a bailout with error messages. Older Linux machines may have version 1.XX of Bash as the default installation.

  #!/bin/bash minimum_version=2 # Since Chet Ramey is constantly adding features to Bash, # you may set $minimum_version to 2.XX, 3.XX, or whatever is appropriate. E_BAD_VERSION=80 if [ "$BASH_VERSION" \< "$minimum_version" ] then echo "This script works only with Bash, version $minimum or greater." echo "Upgrade strongly recommended." exit $E_BAD_VERSION fi ...

• Using Bash-specific functionality in a Bourne shell script (#!/bin/sh) on a non-Linux machine may cause unexpected behavior. A Linux system usually aliases sh to bash, but this does not necessarily hold true for a generic UNIX machine.

• Using undocumented features in Bash turns out to be a dangerous practice. In previous releases of this book there were several scripts that depended on the "feature" that, although the maximum value of an exit or return value was 255, that limit did not apply to negative integers. Unfortunately, in version 2.05b and later, that loophole disappeared. See Example 23-9.

• A script with DOS-type newlines (\r\n) will fail to execute, since #!/bin/bash\r\n is not recognized, not the same as the expected #!/bin/bash\n. The fix is to convert the script to UNIX-style newlines.

  #!/bin/bash echo "Here" unix2dos $0 # Script changes itself to DOS format. chmod 755 $0 # Change back to execute permission. # The 'unix2dos' command removes execute permission. ./$0 # Script tries to run itself again. # But it won't work as a DOS file. echo "There" exit 0

• A shell script headed by #!/bin/sh will not run in full Bash-compatibility mode. Some Bash-specific functions might be disabled. Scripts that need complete access to all the Bash-specific extensions should start with #!/bin/bash.

• Putting whitespace in front of the terminating limit string of a here document will cause unexpected behavior in a script.

• Putting more than one echo statement in a function whose output is captured.

  add2 () { echo "Whatever ... " # Delete this line! let "retval = $1 + $2" echo $retval } num1=12 num2=43 echo "Sum of $num1 and $num2 = $(add2 $num1 $num2)" # Sum of 12 and 43 = Whatever ... # 55 # The "echoes" concatenate.

  This will not work.

• A script may not export variables back to its parent process, the shell, or to the environment. Just as we learned in biology, a child process can inherit from a parent, but not vice versa.

  WHATEVER=/home/bozo export WHATEVER exit 0

  bash$ echo $WHATEVER bash$

  Sure enough, back at the command prompt, $WHATEVER remains unset.

• Setting and manipulating variables in a subshell, then attempting to use those same variables outside the scope of the subshell will result an unpleasant surprise.

  Example 31-2. Subshell Pitfalls

  #!/bin/bash # Pitfalls of variables in a subshell. outer_variable=outer echo echo "outer_variable = $outer_variable" echo ( # Begin subshell echo "outer_variable inside subshell = $outer_variable" inner_variable=inner # Set echo "inner_variable inside subshell = $inner_variable" outer_variable=inner # Will value change globally? echo "outer_variable inside subshell = $outer_variable" # Will 'exporting' make a difference? # export inner_variable # export outer_variable # Try it and see. # End subshell ) echo echo "inner_variable outside subshell = $inner_variable" # Unset. echo "outer_variable outside subshell = $outer_variable" # Unchanged. echo exit 0 # What happens if you uncomment lines 19 and 20? # Does it make a difference?

• Piping echo output to a read may produce unexpected results. In this scenario, the read acts as if it were running in a subshell. Instead, use the set command (as in Example 14-19).

  Example 31-3. Piping the output of echo to a read

  #!/bin/bash # badread.sh: # Attempting to use 'echo and 'read' #+ to assign variables non-interactively. a=aaa b=bbb c=ccc echo "one two three" | read a b c # Try to reassign a, b, and c. echo echo "a = $a" # a = aaa echo "b = $b" # b = bbb echo "c = $c" # c = ccc # Reassignment failed. # ------------------------------ # Try the following alternative. var=`echo "one two three"` set -- $var a=$1; b=$2; c=$3 echo "-------" echo "a = $a" # a = one echo "b = $b" # b = two echo "c = $c" # c = three # Reassignment succeeded. # ------------------------------ # Note also that an echo to a 'read' works within a subshell. # However, the value of the variable changes *only* within the subshell. a=aaa # Starting all over again. b=bbb c=ccc echo; echo echo "one two three" | ( read a b c; echo "Inside subshell: "; echo "a = $a"; echo "b = $b"; echo "c = $c" ) # a = one # b = two # c = three echo "-----------------" echo "Outside subshell: " echo "a = $a" # a = aaa echo "b = $b" # b = bbb echo "c = $c" # c = ccc echo exit 0

  In fact, as Anthony Richardson points out, piping to any loop can cause a similar problem.

  # Loop piping troubles. # This example by Anthony Richardson, #+ with addendum by Wilbert Berendsen. foundone=false find $HOME -type f -atime +30 -size 100k | while true do read f echo "$f is over 100KB and has not been accessed in over 30 days" echo "Consider moving the file to archives." foundone=true # ------------------------------------ echo "Subshell level = $BASH_SUBSHELL" # Subshell level = 1 # Yes, we're inside a subshell. # ------------------------------------ done # foundone will always be false here since it is #+ set to true inside a subshell if [ $foundone = false ] then echo "No files need archiving." fi # =====================Now, here is the correct way:================= foundone=false for f in $(find $HOME -type f -atime +30 -size 100k) # No pipe here. do echo "$f is over 100KB and has not been accessed in over 30 days" echo "Consider moving the file to archives." foundone=true done if [ $foundone = false ] then echo "No files need archiving." fi # ==================And here is another alternative================== # Places the part of the script that reads the variables #+ within a code block, so they share the same subshell. # Thank you, W.B. find $HOME -type f -atime +30 -size 100k | { foundone=false while read f do echo "$f is over 100KB and has not been accessed in over 30 days" echo "Consider moving the file to archives." foundone=true done if ! $foundone then echo "No files need archiving." fi }

  A lookalike problem occurs when trying to write the stdout of a tail -f piped to grep.

  tail -f /var/log/messages | grep "$ERROR_MSG" >> error.log # The "error.log" file will not have anything written to it. # As Samuli Kaipiainen points out, this results from grep #+ buffering its output. # The fix is to add the "--line-buffered" parameter to grep.

• Using "suid" commands within scripts is risky, as it may compromise system security. [1]

• Using shell scripts for CGI programming may be problematic. Shell script variables are not "typesafe," and this can cause undesirable behavior as far as CGI is concerned. Moreover, it is difficult to "cracker-proof" shell scripts.

• Bash does not handle the double slash (//) string correctly.

• Bash scripts written for Linux or BSD systems may need fixups to run on a commercial UNIX (or Apple OSX) machine. Such scripts often employ the GNU set of commands and filters, which have greater functionality than their generic UNIX counterparts. This is particularly true of such text processing utilites as tr.